V 289. Pantikapaion.Epitaph of Gennaios, Trophimos and Adyita (?), IV-Vth centuries C.E.

Monument

Type

Stele. 

Material

Limestone. 

Dimensions (cm)

H.47.0, W.36.0, Th.9.0.

Additional description

The top right and bottom left corners are broken off. 

Place of Origin

Pantikapaion. 

Find place

Kerch. 

Find context

Glinishche, yard of Iochanyuk. 

Find circumstances

February 1875, chance find. 

Modern location

Kerch, Crimea. 

Institution and inventory

Historical and Archeological Museum of Kerch State Historical and Cultural Preserve, КЛ–546. 

Autopsy

September 2008. 

Epigraphic field 1

Position

On the front. 

Lettering

Lapidary. Alpha with a broken crossbar, delta and lambda with upwards protruding right hastae, rectangular epsilon, theta, omicron and sigma. 

Letterheights (cm)

3.0–4.0.

Text 1

Category

Epitaph. 

Date

IV-Vth centuries C.E. 

Dating criteria

Palaeography. 

Editions

L1. Stefani1879, 216; 1.2. Kulakovsky1891, 29, № 3; 2. Latyshev1896, 91–92, № 90; 2.1. Diatroptov, Yemets1995, № 11. 

Edition

Ἐνθάδε
κατάκιτ-
ε ὁ δοῦλο-
ς τοῦ Θ(εο)ῦ
5Γεννε͂ος.

Diplomatic

ΕΝΘΑΔΕ
ΚΑΤΑΚΙΤ
ΕΟΔΟΥΛΟ
ΣΤΟΥΘΥ
5ΓΕΝΝΕΟΣ

EpiDoc (XML)

<div type="textpart" subtype="inscription" n="1">
      <ab>
      <lb n="1"/><g ref="#stauros"/> Ἐνθάδε
      <lb n="2"/>κατάκιτ<lb n="3" break="no"/>ε ὁ δοῦλο<lb n="4" break="no"/>ς τοῦ <roleName><expan><abbr>Θ</abbr><ex>εο</ex><abbr>ῦ</abbr></expan></roleName>
      <lb n="5"/>Γεννε͂ος.
      </ab>
   </div>

Translation

Here lies a servant of God, Gennaios.

 

Commentary

The inscription was transcribed by Latyshev at the Tsarski tumulus in 1883.

1. Line 1, in Latyshev's opinion, was cut earlier, although I think that Texts 2 and 3 were added later to Text 1. These are probably the names of people whose burials were added to the original grave. We should note that alpha with broken crossbar here occurs later than alpha with slanting crossbar.

1–4. On the formula, see Introduction IV.3.F.d.

5. The name Gennaios (here Genneos) is not known in Bosporus. This classical name is also attested in Christian epigraphy (Humann 1888, № 22 (Hierapolis in Phrygia, V–VIth century); IG XIV, 2327.

 

Images

Epigraphic field 2

Position

Above text 1. 

Lettering

Lapidary. Round and rectangular omicron, rectangular sigma. Delta with wide bottom. 

Text 2

Category

Epitaph. 

Date

IV-Vth centuries C.E. 

Dating criteria

Palaeography. 

Editions

L.1. Latyshev1896, 90; 1.1. Diatroptov, Yemets1995, № 11. 

Edition

Τρόφιμος

Diplomatic

ΤΡΟΦΙΜΟΣ

EpiDoc (XML)

<div type="textpart" subtype="inscription" n="2">
      <ab>
      <lb n="1"/>Τρόφιμος <g ref="#stauros"/>       
      </ab>
   </div>

Translation

Trophimos.

 

Commentary

Stefani's transcription incorrectly represented Texts 2 and 3.

2. In the name Trophimos, see commentary to V 284.

 

Epigraphic field 3

Position

Above Text 1. 

Lettering

Lapidary, kionedon. Delta with wide bottom. 

Text 3

Category

Epitaph. 

Date

IV-Vth centuries C.E. 

Dating criteria

Palaeography. 

Editions

Unpublished. 

Edition


δ
υ
ι
5τ
α (?).

Diplomatic

Α
Δ
Υ
Ι
5Τ
Α(?)

EpiDoc (XML)

<div type="textpart" subtype="inscription" n="3">
      <ab>
      <lb n="1"/>Ἀ
      <lb n="2"/>δ
      <lb n="3"/>υ
      <lb n="4"/>ι
      <lb n="5"/>τ
      <lb n="6"/>α <certainty locus="value" match=".." cert="low"/>.
      </ab>
   </div>

Translation

Adyita (?).

 

Commentary

Stefani's transcription incorrectly represented Texts 2 and 3. The meaning of letters in Text 3 was also unclear to Latyshev.

The name Adyita, which has no parallels, is restored hypothetically.

 

(cc)© 2015 Andrey Vinogradov (edition), Irene Polinskaya (translation)
You may download this inscription in EpiDoc XML. (This file should validate to theEpiDoc schema.)